Riverdale Park Sees Major Drop in Speed Camera Revenue
The town has taken in about $1 million less than at the same time last year.
Revenue from speed cameras has dipped 68 percent in Riverdale Park since this time last year, leading town officials to believe drivers are heeding posted speed limits in the town's four enforcement areas.
About two years ago, the town installed speed cameras in four problematic spots: Good Luck Road, Riverdale Road near Riverdale Elementary, and two locations on East-West Highway at Taylor Road.
The number of $40 tickets issued to speeding drivers has declined since then, according to Ward 2 Councilman Alan Thompson, meaning the town will likely receive about $250,000 less than projected.
“The flow of traffic is just slower now,” said Thompson, who chairs the Riverdale Park Town Council’s finance committee. “That’s a public safety victory, but it does have an effect on our budget.”
In the previous fiscal year, citations issued to speeders in Riverdale Park netted more than $1.7 million, according to Town Administrator Sara Imhulse.
As of March 31, Riverdale Park had received more than $453,000 in fines from the cameras, compared to the more than $1.4 million generated this time last year. If the trend continues, Thompson said the year’s total would amount to about $601,000.
Riverdale Park officials didn’t expect speeding to diminish as dramatically as it has and thought the cameras would at least garner the $850,000 the state allows towns to keep, Thompson said.
But Thompson added that he’s glad more drivers are easing off the pedal and believes Riverdale Park will be able to make up the deficit without resorting to budget cuts. The town is ahead on real estate and personal property taxes, he noted, and the police and public works departments will be under their budget partly due to vacant salaried positions.
Ward 3 Councilman David Lingua said it’s okay that the cameras probably won't make as much money for Riverdale Park this year, because that was never the town’s intention.
“We’re not in the business of making money off of speed cameras — that’s not the purpose of them,” said Lingua, who also chairs the town’s public safety committee. “The purpose of them is to encourage drivers to obey the speed limit, and especially in a school zone.”
One small factor in the decrease could be the absence of a camera at Good Luck Road site, Thompson said. Vendor Optotraffic took down the camera to replace it in October.
Optotraffic hopes to install a new one by the end of this month, said James Murphy, who is the Riverdale Park Police Department's patrol officer in charge of supervising the speed cameras.
But Murphy said the main reason why revenue is down is simple: the cameras are doing their job.
“That’s what they’re supposed to do is slow people down,” he said.
Carol Cron
10:01 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Having received a ticket from the Taylor Road/East-West Highway camera, I'm pleased that speeding has diminished in Riverdale Park. However, I am surprised (actually, not surprised) that the town council would state ". . . but it does have an effect on our budget. . . Riverdale Park officials didn’t expect speeding to diminish as dramatically as it has and thought the cameras would at least garner the $850,000 the state allows towns to keep." This shows residents that speed cameras are more of a financial incentive for towns/cities rather than a safety issue. "Riverdale Park had received more than $453,000 in fines from the cameras, compared to the more than $1.4 million generated this time last year."
Danny
7:49 am on Monday, April 9, 2012
indeed. the "but" in “That’s a public safety victory, but it does have an effect on our budget" is curious. it is indeed a public safety victory -- period. the "but" implies that continued speeding would have a positive effect on the town budget. however, according to the official storyline, the town was experiencing excessive speeding, and the cameras were adopted as a way to curb that problem. the revenue generated was purely incidental. why is the financial committee commenting on the situation? you'd think the police would be the only ones to make statements about the cameras.
Kirsten Jensen
8:33 am on Sunday, April 8, 2012
Perhaps this is just anecdotal but having to use several of the roads for my morning and evening commute I would suggest there is another reason - road construction. I do not remember when they tore up East-West Hightway but it seems like it has been a mess since last summer. Speeding on that road now has a lot more peril built into it than it did before. The only true measure of if driving habits have changed will occur after the repave the road and evaluate the ticket statistics for a few months after. Drawing conclusions now when there are more variables at play than just 'consumber choice' is foolhardy
Adrianne
10:27 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012
I believe speed cameras only serve to distract drivers by forcing their focus and concentration from the road to their speedometer. 35 mph is too slow for that stretch of road anyway; it's two lane divided highway. I say raise it to 40 mph until Taylor Road. Although, that would lower revenue right off the bat, wouldn't it...