Lawmakers Oppose New Congressional District Map
The map is "so blatantly gerrymandered that District 3 looks like blood spatter from a crime scene," Montgomery County Council member Phil Andrews said.
Maryland's new U.S. congressional district map—approved during a General Assembly special session last fall—has been met with enough criticism to make it the subject of a referendum question on the Nov. 6 ballot.
As Election Day draws near, opponents of the new boundaries are making their opinions heard.
On Monday, more than two dozen elected state, county and city officials and community leaders met in Rockville to oppose the state's new congressional map and to urge voters to repeal it on Nov. 6 by voting against Question No. 5 on the ballot, according to the office of Montgomery County Council member Phil Andrews.
"Maryland's new congressional map is so blatantly gerrymandered that District 3 looks like blood spatter from a crime scene, ridiculously including the far-flung communities of Annapolis, Towson and parts of Silver Spring, while excluding most communities between," Andrews said in a statement.
In addition to Andrews and other County Council members, including Marc Elrich, Valerie Ervin, Nancy Floreen, Craig Rice and Hans Riemer, those in attendance included State Delegates Ana Sol Gutierrez (D-Montgomery) and Aisha Braveboy (D-Prince George’s); Rockville Mayor Phyllis Marcuccio; Rockville City Council Members Tom Moore, Bridget Newton and Mark Pierzchala; Gaithersburg City Council Members Jud Ashman, Cathy Drzyzgula and Henry Marraffa; and Takoma Park City Council Member Seth Grimes.
Delegates Gutierrez and Aisha Braveboy, along with Montgomery Delegates Al Carr and Luis Simmons, voted against the congressional map in last October’s special session, the news release said.
If a majority of voters vote "no" on (i.e., oppose) Question 5, Gov. Martin O'Malley and the Maryland General Assembly will be required to redraw the state's U.S. congressional boundaries for the 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020 elections. A "no" vote could also lead to the establishment of an independent redistricting commission, the statement added.
The redistricting (as the district boundaries' redrawing is called) was required following the 2010 U.S. Census.
At Monday's gathering, Gutierrez presented figures showing that the minority population in new congressional Districts 3, 6 and 8 would be severely reduced.
"Rather than promoting increased opportunities for minority congressional representation, the redistricting map fragments and redistributes minority populations," Gutierrez said in a statement. "In each new district, minority proportional representation is so diminished as to make it nearly impossible to elect minority candidates in Congress over the next 10 years."
Others in attendance included Greg Rabidoux, a national redistricting expert with Common Cause of Maryland; Democratic precinct chairs Michael Cogan, Sheldon Fishman, Margaret Greene and Steve Shapiro; businessman/philanthropist Josh Rales; and community leaders Art Brodsky and Michael Lin.
Do you agree with the new U.S. congressional district boundaries for Maryland? Tell us in the comments.
Woodside Park Bob
6:58 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Ideally we need an amendment to the US Constitution which requires that redistricting in all states be done by a nonpartisan, independent group appointed jointly by all parties with seats in a state's legislature. The independent redistricting group should be required to propose a map which has the most compact equally populated districts possible which to the extent possible do not divide cities or communities with similar interests. Ideally a computer based system should be used to do this. Preserving seats of incumbents or maximizing the number of seats held by a given party should not be a factor.
This reform needs to be done on the federal level so the Democrats in Maryland, for example, don't feel the need to Gerrymander to offset the Gerrymandering by Republicans in other states. In the absence of reform at the federal level, we should at least have this kind of reform in Maryland. Our districts should be fairly drawn even if other states' are not.
Eric S.
9:35 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
My alternate fix to this would be to add a crapload more offices to the House of Representatives. The original House had like 1 to every 10,000 people or something, and now we're closer to like 1 to every 100,000 or so. Not sure on exact numbers, but we've been at 535 reps. for over a century now, and the population has grown immensely.
Sure, it'd seem like chaos to have that many people trying to make laws, but in reality, that's the point of the House. It would make actual representatives be closer to their constituents, and makes it a lot harder to gerrymander districts when you just don't have that much space. Even if some are gerrymandered, the others will cancel out.
It follows the KISS (keep it simple, stupid) principle, and fits the basic design of the country without a bunch of complications, when tend to lead to loopholes, which lead to exploitation, etc. I'd also like to see our voting systems change to something that favors having more than two nearly identical parties, but that's for another time.
Rachel Young
10:06 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Esther, thanks for educating us about Question 5! The Atlantic published a great article on gerrymandering practices in the US (here is a link to an online article on this subject: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/the-twisted-history-of-gerrymandering-in-american-politics/262369/).
Grass Seed
11:08 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Isn't anyone going to call Delegate Gutierrez on her vile comment? "In each new district, minority proportional representation is so diminished as to make it nearly impossible to elect minority candidates in Congress over the next 10 years."
...er because white people only vote for white candidates? Really? As someone of European extraction, I grew up in a city whose mayor was Hispanic then followed by an African American mayor. In both cases, these men were elected and re-elected with a LARGE swath of the white vote. You may have noticed our President is of African descent, elected with, yes, you guessed it, a large block of white voters. The Montgomery county executive, Ike Legget, is also a black man. Mr. Legget has won two BLOWOUT elections for that job in a county that is 64% white.
According to Ms. Gutierrez, this is impossible. Because minority leadership will only be elected by minority voters in her view. I think Ms. Gutierrez is a dinosaur, stuck playing the same old race-baiting tribalistic us-vs-them games from the 1960s and has far too little respect for or faith in the people of our state. Either that, or she's afraid of a genuine election competition where she will have to compete on vision and achievements rather than a "vote-for-me-becasue-I-look-like-you" strategy.
Time to grow up Ms. Gutierrez.
Marcus Aurelius
11:31 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
right on grass seed, it is funny as I watch all these democrats in the tv commercials tell the public that, politicans never do as they say they are going to, or the money never seems to show up, well amybe the people that are saying it should stop voting for the party that never delivers what the ysay, just like the man in the white house was going to cut the deficit in half but gave us 6 trillion in new debt, was going to be the most transparent administration, but has been the worst when it comes to giving information being asked from the freedom of information act. all the ycan ever place is the race card and nobody ever rebuts them because they will be callled a racist. the intteligent in the country know the democratic party is the party of racist, and race baiting.
Dana Schwartz
5:55 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012
How can there be so many jerks in this state? This was not about Dems vs Reps, it was about disenfranchisement and too much power in the hands of people we didn't vote for! Very disappointed. It's an embarrassment being "the most gerrymandered state in the US".
It's time for an amendment instituting term limits for MD legislators!