patching...
Update: Get FREE local headlines delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for the Riverdale Park-University Park Patch newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Live Coverage: District Council Approves Cafritz Plan

By a 7-2 vote, the controversial mixed-use rezoning proposal cleared its final major legislative hurdle Monday.

 

Editor's Note: The District Council concluded its proceedings on the Cafritz project Monday in Upper Marlboro. Below is an archive of Patch's live coverage.

-----

4:54 p.m.: Bye for now!

With that, the council has adjourned.

4:53 p.m.: APPROVED

The Prince George's County District Council has approved the Cafritz rezoning plan by a 7-2 vote. Stay tuned for more coverage.

4:47 p.m.: Clarification

People's Zoning Counsel Stan Brown clarifies the effect of Campos' motion, which would "approve planning board decision and all of its stated conditions" without modification.

4:42 p.m.: Motion to approve

Campos has made a motion to approve the Cafritz plan. There's a bit of confusion about the precise wording required.

4:38 p.m.: Motion to deny fails, 3-6

The motion to deny the application has failed, 3-6.

4:34 p.m.: 'Not convinced'

Before casting her vote on the denial motion, chair Andrea Harrison says she is "not convinced" that the property should be rezoned for a single user, which is "what it really boils down to."

4:29 p.m.: Filing in opposition

Campos expresses puzzlement at College Park's decision to participate in negotiations with the developer "only to end up filing in opposition for this project."

4:28 p.m.: Campos speaks

Olson concludes his remarks, and Councilman Will Campos takes the mic. Campos says he opposes the motion to deny the application and begins to lay out his reasons for supporting the project.

4:25 p.m.: 'No confidence'

"I have no confidence that a bridge will be built," Olson says, referring to the CSX crossing required by the conditions for approval.

He adds that "we have all seen" examples of developer conditions falling through and later being lifted.

4:23 p.m.: 'Never envisioned for such high intensity'

Olson says the proposal is incompatible with the parameters of Mixed-Use Town Center zoning and is too dense for its surroundings.

"This property was never envisioned for such high intensity," Olson says.

4:16: p.m.: Motion of denial

We're back in session. Councilman Eric Olson has made a motion for denial of the Cafritz application. Debate is now beginning.

4:10 p.m.: About to begin

The council is in a brief recess following earlier oral arguments on the Maryland Book Exchange project, but debate on the Cafritz project is coming up soon.

Original article:

After months of legislative debate and years of planning, the Prince George's County District Council is set to discuss—and likely vote—on the Cafritz rezoning plan Monday in Upper Marlboro.

The meeting is set to begin at 1:30 p.m., though two other items are scheduled before the Cafritz application.

Public hearings on the plan, which lasted 30-plus hours over six days, wrapped up in May. The Council now must vote on the application before the July 20 deadline, or it will be deemed disapproved automatically.

If approved, a 37-acre parcel on the north end of Riverdale Park would be redesignated from single-family detached residential (R-55) to mixed-use town center (M-UTC), easing the way for the construction of more than 900 units of housing, a 35,000-square-foot Whole Foods, a 120-room hotel, and additional office and retail space.

Supporters say the project will spur economic growth and bring a desirable mix of retail and residential development to the area—an argument embraced by the Prince George's County Planning Board. Critics charge that the plan would impose extreme fiscal, environmental, and traffic pressure on the surrounding communities.

See below for past coverage of the approval process:

District Council

Planning Board

Municipal Boards

Related Topics: Cafritz Property, Prince George's County District Council, and Rezoning

BigDan

6:49 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

Oh good! As if traffic in that area isn't allready a nightmare! When school is in session traffic backs up on the southbound side all the way to the postal facility or worse. If they want to build this then they need to reopen Queens Chapel Road. Traffic got so much worse when they closed that road and this Overpriced Foods is going to make it even more terrible.
Why do council members think this area is full of rich hipsters who want overpriced garbage stores?
Yall thought so highly of the University Town Center and no one goes there anymore AND it's facing foreclosure. How long until the Eya Eyesore down RT 1 faces the same fate? Then this monstosity will follow once the novelty wears off.
People saw the Bowie Town Center and thought this whole "walking" shopping center was a good idea. But now even BTC is infested with gangs and is unsafe to shop. What's going to happen when you take this crime ravaged section of PG county and put unsuspecting people in the middle of gangland?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danny

7:50 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

it's amazing that, even in the face of well-written, fact-based, level-headed, reasonable arguments against the cafritz project such as those articulated above by "BigDan," the project was approved nonetheless!

and it's not just cafritz! what was the county thinking when it approved "eyesores" like rowhomes and retail space in historic downtown hyattsville? and to destroy beautiful empty lots to do so? for shame! i hope those "unsuspecting" EYA homebuyers are able to flee their "crime ravaged" community before it's too late.

oh, well. we can only hope that PG county's whole foods offers the same quality of "overpriced garbage" as offered in the silver spring and annapolis whole foods. no more second-best for us here in "gangland"!

Comment_arrow

Pachacutec

9:36 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I agree completely; I've lived in the area for most of my over-60 years and contrary to what some people might think, I am NOT against change. However, since I HAVE lived here for so long, I have a somewhat different perspective on how these changes will affect our area than people who either don't live nearby or who've only lived around here for a few years. Going to University Town Center is almost like going into a ghost town, even during the day and even during the day I don't feel safe walking around all of those empty stores. I don't care one way or the other about Whole Foods, but even if they're left out of this proposal, what on earth is going to happen to our neighborhoods when all of those hundreds of extra housing units come in? Far too many people are acting like there will be little or no impact and while I'd love to agree with them, it just ain' gonna happen, folks. Too, if people want to put in new housing units or new stores, for goodness sakes, there's vacant properties which were storefronts all over the County. We don't need to tear up what few green spaces we have left. But hey, trees just create oxygen which we breathe, who needs that, right?

Comment_arrow

Danny

9:40 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

@Pachacutec -- You really agree completely with BigDan's comments? I understand that you oppose this project, but some of the things BigDan wrote about our community are quite strong. Do you really agree with this?

Michael B. Cron

7:23 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

Common sense and the democratic process just flew out of the window in Prince George's County with regards to the "Cafritz Nightmare" that will be forced down our throats. If the five council persons who voted yes to this would in any way shape or form have been inconvenienced by this poorly thought out development would certainly never have approved it. My utmost respect goes out to Councilman Eric Olson and Councilwomen Mary Lehman for their attempt to overturn this ill conceived development.

Reply

Danny

7:55 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

to all those local residents who promised to move away from the area if cafritz gets approved: when you put your home up for sale, make sure your realtor includes in the posting the fact that whole foods has a lease in an approved development in riverdale park!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melissa Avery

9:09 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

since we are probably getting an Aldi and a dollar store now "mid County can join the rest of PG.

Comment_arrow

Danny

9:30 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

actually, we already have an aldi in the community (in west hyattsville), not to mention more dollar stores than i can count.

i presume from your comment, though, that you have some information suggesting to you that aldi is planning another store in the area. if so, please share!

Comment_arrow

Melissa Avery

9:43 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Well if you followed the hearings you might have caugt the fact that Whole Foods is not necessarily going to be the Grocery store that will occupy the Cafritz property. There is simply going to be a "grocery store" at that point, slated for that location.
Personalty I think Cafrits is going for a zoning change so they can dump the tract at some profit.

Comment_arrow

Danny

9:46 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

thanks -- just wanted to check whether you were expressing your opinion (which, of course, is your prerogative) or you actually had some information that aldi is coming. apparently it's the former and not the latter.

Neighbor

9:47 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

Hilarious Danny, I can't believe the animosity that this development has inspired. The only gang I see around here is a bunch of negative nancies from University Park. They're apparently going to appeal the decision and drag this mess on. What I foresee happening now is the cafritz property will be deforested and then get stuck in litigation. Then we will have to stare at a dry empty field for the next 20 years. It would be best for all of us if we could just accept that change is needed and inevitable. All of our neighborhoods in this region will still be here, our dilapidated sidewalks, extensive power line display, weed infested flower beds, and charming demographics will continue to be te envy of DC. The people who have lived here for the past 50 years have failed to build a thriving community, yet they hold onto some twisted ideal that things are fine just the way they are. They should be ashamed of the blight they've helped create. Here's a news flash, it takes energy to bring order. We need the financial investment. We need more fancy urban housing. We need a larger tax base. We need infrastructure improvements. In a world Have vs. Have Nots, we cannot afford to let our community be the armpit of DC.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adelphi Sky

11:07 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

Fear of change blinds people to the inevitable benefits that usually follow with circumstances such as this. What is there to fear? People would rather be comfortable in familiar surroundings even when those surroundings are like a cancer to progress and positive change. When will people learn that its okay that society is moving forward. What's so wrong with growth in an urban area? That's to be expected. And to live next to a major university and not expect the main thoroughfare into a major urban city to remain untouched is a bit naive and shortsighted. Yes, traffic is an issue. But there is progress like the future Purple Line and housing and services close to the University like the Future East Campus development and the recent University View properties. Everything can't be built and fixed in one fell swoop. There will be fits and starts. Growth will come in spurts. Not everyone will agree on how some of that growth occurs, but does it have to be as bad as the Apocalypse as some would have us believe? Change will occur with or without us. We can learn to live with it and appreciate it or live in misery and disdain. I choose the former. It's more healthy. :)

Comment_arrow

Melissa Avery

9:11 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Amazing how people who do not live near the proposed building are all for it and the people who are directly impacted think it is disastrous.
Try living on Rockville Pike for a few months and you might be singing a different tune.

Comment_arrow

Neighbor

1:00 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I do live less than a mile from it. And I drive through there all the time unless I'm feeling adventurous, in which case, I cut through the maze that is University Park.

Joe Kelly

11:03 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

Contrary to what is reported above, what the council voted to approve today was a motion to finalize the application for rezoning, to include the negotiated conditions as written. No more, no less. When the council's attorneys produce this final document, the council will meet again to give it its true final vote. Normally a formality, the convoluted zoning request and the attached conditions, with their myriad ramifications, is still subject to approval by the council. Should any members have deeper concerns about the realization of the plan with all the attached conditions, they are free to withhold support if they think that to be the best course. Any constituents who wish to be heard should write or call their county council representatives by Thursday.

Reply

Lee Havis

6:48 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Thanks to Eric Olson for making the good case for sanity in this matter. Without the traffic control, there will be unbelievable bottle-necks on Rt. 1. The next bright idea will be to close off Rt. 1 and make it a "green-zone" bike and hike path -- because it will be impossible to use for cars and such. In a more lengthy article, someone should address the reason that ordinary single-dwelling housing project is not profitable for someone to develop in that area. Instead, we will have a "Potter's town"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danny

6:57 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Lee Havis, why don't you take a break from making anti-gay comments to do some actual research on why an "ordinary single-dwelling housing project" is or is not appropriate for the cafritz land? then perhaps YOU can write the article you propose.

Comment_arrow

Melissa Avery

9:16 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

To Danny -
your sniping is not adding anything interesting or intelligent to this discussion. Anyone who reads patch and sees your name attached to a post automatically knows the remark will be snide, sniping and irrelevant and or twisted.

Comment_arrow

Danny

9:27 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

i'm sorry. i didn't realize you were the official mouthpiece for the community as well as the intelligence police. please give me your contact info, and i'll be sure to run my opinions by you for permission before posting them. thanks!

Comment_arrow

Melissa Avery

9:36 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Danny - don't get distracted - it's time to turn on rush.

Comment_arrow

Danny

9:44 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

wow, you sure have me pegged! people who shop at whole foods are also known for being rush limbaugh acolytes!

Comment_arrow

Melissa Avery

9:48 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Wow Danny you shop at Whole Foods?
Can you pick me up some goat cheese the next time you go there.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

John Davisson

9:59 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Danny, Melissa: play nice, please. --The Editor

Mark G

8:44 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

There is room for debate about the size and scope of the Cafritz project. There is no question that the development as planned will increase traffic but the best solution would seem to be to encourage more public transportation options and more communities with stores and services close by that encourage walking and biking. If every development that has the possibility of bringing more traffic is defeated on that basis , there will be little or no growth.
It is worth noting that while there are trees on the Cafritz porperty, it is hardly a pristine woodland. The area was the site of a large housing development for ERCO workers during WWII. THe property is not a pleasant parkland now or anything resembling it.
In an ideal world , the entire area might be develooped as a park, with ball fields and green spaces but I doubt the funds exist for such an amenity.
The Cafritz project seems fairly well thought out and is an improvement over the many poorly built , badly planned developments that have characterized the growth of PG County over the last 50 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mike arnold

12:07 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Nicely summarized! And extraordinarily significant engagement by Hyattsville, University Park, Riverdale Park and College Park citizens, professionals and officials has gotten us this far. It will take our continued vigilance over the next 5 years to realize this development as a true asset to all of our communities. So please do engage and insist on a continued open process as there will continue to be opportunities for public input.

Leave a comment